Recent Blog Posts
A Matter of Art and Science
Over 95 percent of civil cases are settled out of court. In a personal injury settlment, the victim receives money in exchange for a waiver of all claims related to the incident. While the outcome is fairly certain, the process is anything but. In fact, a successful settlement in a personal injury case, which is defined as the most possible compensation, is a delicate combination of science and art.
The Science: Preliminary Steps
Before a demand can even be made, the amount of damages must be determined. In most cases that involve a serious injury, all immediate medical needs must be taken care of: broken bones should be mostly healed and other immediate injuries must be addressed. Additionally, most doctors need to evaluate their patients over the course of several visits, to determine an appropriate course of long-term treatment.
Once the amount of current economic damages is established, the amount of future economic damages can be fairly ascertained. Because of the permanent waiver, future expenses must be accounted for, to the greatest extent possible.
Fatal Hill Country Wreck
One person is dead after two trucks collided near the intersection of Borgfeld Road and U.S. 281 in northern Bexar County.
Sherriff’s deputies reported that one vehicle was pulling out of a subdivision and onto the highway, directly into the path of a speeding truck. The force of the impact propelled both vehicles down the highway, leaving a trail of debris on the roadway before they eventually came to rest not far from each other. One victim was airlifted to a local hospital, but he was pronounced dead en route.
Authorities have yet to determine fault in the crash.
Comparative Fault
In the above incident, it seems that both drivers may have been partially at fault: one apparently failed to yield the right-of-way to oncoming traffic and the other one may have been exceeding the speed limit. If taken independently, either act constitutes negligence per se as a violation of a traffic law.
Chocolate Milk to Help Concussions?
A Maryland school official intends to order $25,000 worth of chocolate milk to help student athletes recover from concussions.
The Washington County superintendent acknowledged that scientists may believe he is “[expletive deleted] nuts” to think that chocolate milk can limit brain damage, but he says the move is supported by an unpublished study from the University of Maryland. That study concluded that athletes who drank a specific brand of chocolate milk after games and practices had higher scores on post-concussion cognitive tests that athletes who did not drink it. The product manufacturer stated that the milk has enhanced levels of protein, electrolytes, and other brain-friendly ingredients.
When asked to comment, a neuropsychologist at the Sports Concussion Center of New Jersey speculated that the correlation is simply due to the fact that “regular hydration and nutrition for athletes is important for brain health and neuroprotection.”
Near-Fatal Car Crash in San Antonio
A high speed collision on the South Side between a speeding car and a large SUV raises interesting questions regarding fault and liability.
The wreck took place near the intersection of Southwest Military Drive and Somerset Road. A Chevrolet Caprice and SUV were traveling in the same direction, when the Caprice apparently cut in front of the SUV while traveling at a high rate of speed. The Caprice driver lost control of the vehicle, which then careened into a utility pole before being partially rear-ended by the SUV.
Three people were rushed to a local hospital with serious injuries, but all of them are expected to survive.
Common Defenses in a Negligence Case
As a preliminary note, insurance companies will do almost anything to deny fair compensation to victims, or at least reduce the amount of damages they receive, and there are a number of recognized defenses that defendants use to accomplish this objective.
A Deadly End to 2015
A head-on crash on Loop 1604 in southwestern Bexar County left one person dead and two people in the hospital.
The wreck took place in the early morning hours close to Benton City Road. According to police, a 19-year-old driver of a large SUV crossed the center line into the northbound lane, where the vehicle slammed head-on at full speed into a smaller car. The 49-year-old driver was declared dead at the scene. Her teenage daughter, who was in the passenger seat, was rushed to a local hospital along with the SUV driver. Both of them are expected to survive.
Loop 1604 was closed for several hours while police searched for clues.
Evidence Collection and Preservation
In cases like these which have no witnesses, it can be difficult to establish liability. After all, the plaintiff does have the burden of proof, and although the victim’s testimony alone is often sufficient, sometimes the jury wants more.
Jury Awards $23 Million in Birth Defects Case
One of the largest verdicts in the history of defective drug cases came last year, when a Missouri jury awarded $23 million to a family whose daughter was born with birth defects related to the mother’s Depakote use.
Drug manufacturer Abbot Laboratories currently faces about 800 lawsuits stemming from the popular anti-seizure medication and its link to birth defects. The drug’s popularity peaked in 2007 with over $1.5 billion in sales. But at roughly the same time, the federal government insisted that the manufacturer include additional warnings on the label; in 2010, the New England Journal of Medicine published a major study on the subject. Two years later, Abbot Laboratories paid $1.6 billion to settle state and federal government claims regarding deceptive marketing practices.
With regard to the St. Louis lawsuit and verdict, a company spokesperson insisted that the plaintiff “made an informed decision” to take Depakote during her pregnancy.
Are You a Guy Who Likes to Party?
In one of his many songs about alcoholism, Austin singer Junior Brown once lamented that “when I see those party lights come on, the party’s over for me.” And, during this time of year, the “man in that patrol car who don’t wanna party with me” is out in force, seeking to avoid alcohol-related car crashes before they start.
Despite a seemingly-endless police crackdown, the number of fatal alcohol-related vehicle wrecks remains alarmingly high. In 2013, over 10,000 Americans died in such collisions, resulting in an annual cost of $59 billion. Texas tort law allows victims to attack the problem at one of its sources, which is the people who negligently overserve guests at holiday parties and everyday gatherings. While the Texas Supreme Court has consistently refused to hold social hosts liable for the damages that their intoxicated guests inflict, two back doors are wide open.
Dram Shop Law
Although this provision normally applies only to commercial alcohol sales, the Legislature made some important amendments in 2005. Section 2.02 explicitly makes social hosts liable for the actions of their intoxicated guests if the tortfeasor (negligent person) was under 18.
The Next Big Thing?
A Dallas man wants the Texas opt-out system to become the norm in workers’ compensation plans across the United States.
With a client list that includes some of the country’s largest retailers, his plan is to get opt-out laws passed in a dozen states over the next ten years. Generally, employer-sponsored plans are much more limited than state-mandated workers’ compensation; for example, one large fast-food retailer does not cover carpal tunnel syndrome, which is rather common in cashiers, and a senior living center does not cover most bacterial infections. Moreover, in Texas, most employer-sponsored plans only expenses for two years, even if the victim suffered a lifelong disability.
Advocates claim that opt-out plans, although they may not provide as much coverage, remove the uncertainty that comes from lawmakers continually chipping away at workers’ compensation benefits.
Workers’ Compensation
There Are Alternatives to Fighting
Out-of-court settlements are a large component of our justice system. In fact, a great majority of truck wrecks and other negligence cases are resolved before trial is held, or even before suit is filed. To facilitate these settlements, some form of alternative dispute resolution is nearly always involved in the process.
Parties often voluntarily agree to mediation or some other form of ADR. In many instances, mediation may help expedite the dispute resolution process, control litigation costs, and give the parties more control over the final outcome. Other times, the trial judge orders the parties to attempt ADR. In fact, many judges order the parties to mediation in almost all contested cases. In still other instances, there is a binding arbitration clause in the agreement or contract. Hit-and-run cases are a very good example, as most insurance agreements contain such a provision.
Mediation
Drive Sober Or Get Pulled Over
The upcoming New Year’s Eve holiday probably means another “no refusal” weekend for DUI suspects. What impact does the source of intoxication have on car crashes in South Central Texas?
Last year, 26 Austin drivers were arrested on suspicion of DUI on New Year’s Eve. During the no-refusal initiatives, drivers who refuse to submit to a breath test are transported to a hospital where authorities take a blood test. Such a procedure is quite cumbersome – mostly because the Fourth Amendment requires officers to obtain a search warrant before administering a blood test – which explains why the no-refusal weekends are mostly held on New Year’s Eve, Labor Day Weekend, Memorial Day Weekend, and other holidays traditionally associated with drinking and driving.
Drivers have the right to refuse a BAC test unless the officer has a valid warrant.
Third Party Liability
When an alcohol-impaired driver is involved in a vehicle crash, one of the most important questions to ask is “where did the driver come from?” If the person was bar-hopping or driving home from a bar, dram shop liability is a legitimate possibility. Bear in mind the that driver does not have to be legally intoxicated to be found negligent in civil court.